When something bad happens that involves
myself or more than one person, the situation may take some analyzing to decide
who is at fault. For example, in a situation where someone is borrowing a car
and ends up receiving a ticket because there was a lack of brake lights. The
owner could be blamed because of the absence of lights. The borrower could also
be blamed for this incident because he/she should have made sure the car was
more reliable. The car could have been easily examined by the person in need.
In a situation like this, I would begin to break apart and dissect the whole
situation.
First I would look at how the situation could have been prevented. The owner could have notified his/her friend about the problem instead of leaving him hanging. I would also look at how the situation started. A friend was in need to borrow a car because of lack of transportation. Therefore, the situation would be left to opinion. The people involved would have to determine which idea seems more reasonable or logical to actually come to a conclusion.
First I would look at how the situation could have been prevented. The owner could have notified his/her friend about the problem instead of leaving him hanging. I would also look at how the situation started. A friend was in need to borrow a car because of lack of transportation. Therefore, the situation would be left to opinion. The people involved would have to determine which idea seems more reasonable or logical to actually come to a conclusion.
